Flights 11 and 77 didn't actually exist!!!
The flights alleged to have hit the Nth WTC tower and the Pentagon did
not exist. They were not scheduled to fly that day.
What really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept
by Gerard Holmgren . Copyright. Nov 13, 2003
On the basis of photographic and physical evidence, it has now been
established for some time that on Sept 11, 2001 the damage to the
Pentagon was caused by something other than the hijacked Boeing 757,
American Airlines Flight 77 claimed by the government to have crashed
into the building.
Hunt the Boeing
Physical and Mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. Oct 2002
Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. June 2002
The amazing Pentalawn.
More recently, its become widely accepted on the basis of video
evidence that the object which hit the North Tower of the WTC at 8.46
that morning was not the hijacked Boeing 767, American Airlines Flight
11, as claimed in the official story.
In response to these observations, both supporters of the truth and
blind deniers of it agree on one thing. It raises the question - "If
these flights did not hit the buildings as alleged, then where did
We are now in a position to answer that question.
First lets recap on the official story of what happened to four
planes that morning.
AA 11 left Boston for LA at about 8 am, was reported as hijacked about
8.25, and hit the Nth Tower at about 8.46.
UA 175 left Boston for LA at about the same time, was reported
hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Sth Tower at about 9.03
AA 77 left Dulles for LA about the same time , was reported hijacked
at about 8.55 and hit the Pentagon at about 9.45
UA 93 left Newark for SF at about the same time, was reported
hijacked about 9.45 and crashed in PA atabout 10.10.
The Bureau of transportation website contains search pages, where one
can pull up detailed statistics about the history of which flights
have been scheduled for which airports on any given day. Go to
and click on "detailed statistics" where one can search records of
scheduled and actual departure times, arrival times, diversions and
cancellations by departure airport, arrival airport, airline and
Searches for Sept 11 2001 reveal that the flights AA 11 and AA 77 did
not exist. They were not scheduled that day. Here are the search
results which I encourage everyone to check for themselves.
A search for UA flights from Newark on Sept 11, 2001 shows 0093 to SF
was scheduled at 8.00 and actually departed at 8.01. It is listed as
"diverted" and did not arrive at its destination.
A search for UA from Boston on that day shows 0175 to LA was
scheduled for 8.00 and actually departed at 7.58. Also listed as
"diverted" and did not arrive at its destination.
The term "diverted" does not specify any differentiation between
legally diverted, hijacked or crashed, so the data gives no indication
one way or the other as to truth of the official story about what
happened to them, but it does confirm that they departed as per the
official story and did not arrive at their destinations.
A search for AA flights from Boston that day does not list 0011. The
earliest scheduled AA flight to LA that day was 0181 at 11.00
A search for AA flights from Dulles that day does not list 0077. The
earliest scheduled AA flight to LA was 0135 at 11.15.
Here's a different search method. By returning to the search page URL
listed earlier, and clicking on "summary statistics ", one can find
the historical reliability and punctuality of specific flights over a
period of time, by specifying the airline and flight number and
defining the time period. The search then returns figures on average
delays in departure and arrival times and percentages of cancelled or
If one searches specifically for UA 175 or UA 93 narrowed down to sept
11 only, the search returns the result of "diverted" for each flight.
A similar search for either AA 11 or AA 77 on that date returns "no
If you search for AA 11 or AA 77 on different days, you will find that
they were regularly scheduled flights right up to Sept 10. AA 11 was
scheduled daily from Logan to LA at 8.00, and AA 77 from Dulles to LA
at 7.45. On Sept 11, they were not scheduled. Not cancelled.
Just not scheduled.
On Sept 12, they re-appear in the schedule (obviously as cancelled for
the next few days) up until Sept 20 when both flights change their
Thus the official figures from the Bureau of Transportation
statistics indicate that neither AA 11 nor AA 77 flew on Sept, 11
2001. This solves the question of what happened to them. Nothing.
Because the flights did not exist. This is consistent with other
evidence which shows that they were not the objects responsible for
the Pentagon and Nth WTC tower incidents.
This still leaves unanswered the question of what happened to the
passengers alleged to be aboard the non existent flights. In the case
of AA 77, while one can always speculate about the most plausible
scenarios, I prefer to wait until some real evidence emerges. However
in the case of AA 11, I think it is worth noting that UA 175 left from
the same airport, at the same time for the same destination as that
normally applicable to AA 11. Therefore, although there is no direct
evidence to support the claim, it would seem reasonable to speculate
at this stage that any passengers who were regular fliers
on AA 11, and asked to booked on it that day, went to the airport,
expecting to get on AA 11, as per the normal routine. They were then
told that there was a last minute problem with the flight which could
not be fixed within a reasonable period of time, and were offered a
flight on UA 175 as compensation.
The data in this search indicates that we have been systematically
lied to about the alleged flight paths and hijacking sequence of AA 11
and AA 77, as well as the alleged phone calls made from the planes.
It also indicates probable complicity by American Airlines in the
events of Sept 11 , 2001.
For the benefit of any NWO operatives reading this, just in case
you're thinking of trying to pressure the Bureau into playing hanky
panky with the records, the search results pages have already been
backed up and widely distributed. Nevertheless, I do encourage all
readers to do the searches themselves and back up the results pages,
just in case this happens.
Aiheeseen liittyen (Yahoon frame-up listalta)
This may help to clarify the arguments in relation to alleged
lists being used as an argument that the apparently non existent
were just somehow left off the database.
Here are the regualtions regarding the mandatory reporting of flight
the BTS, as summarized on the BTS site.
As of January, 1995, all flights shown in the airlines' Computerized
Reservation Systems (CRS) are tracked in the database for the purpose
determining what proportion of flights was on-time. This includes
and diverted flights as well as flights affected by mechanical
Now here are extracts from the actual regulations. For those who want
summary of the implications first, before reading the fine print for
themselves, skip to the bottom for my summary.
234.1 Purpose. The purpose of this part is to set forth required data
certain air carriers must submit to the Department and to computer
reservations system vendors in computerized form, except as otherwise
provided, so that information on air carriers' quality of service can
made available to consumers of air transportation. This part also
that service quality data be disclosed directly to consumers.
Sec. 234.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this part: Cancelled
a flight operation that was not operated, but was listed in a
computer reservation system within seven calendar days of the
On-time performance code means a single character determined in
with the provisions of this part that reflects the monthly on-time
performance of certain nonstop flights and single plane one-stop or
multi-stop flights, the schedule and availability of which are listed
computer reservation system (CRS) regulated by 14 CFR part 255.
flight means any nonstop flight, including a mechanically delayed
or from any airport within the contiguous 48 states that accounts for
least 1 percent of domestic scheduled-passenger enplanements in the
calendar year, as reported to the Department pursuant to part 241 of
Sec. 234.4 Reporting of on-time performance. (a) Each reporting
shall file BTS Form 234 ``On-Time Flight Performance Report'' with the
Office of Airline Information on a monthly basis, setting forth the
information for each of its reportable flights held out in the
Airline Guide (OAG), in the computer reservations systems (CRS), or
schedule publications. The reportable flights include, but are not
to, cancelled flights, mechanically cancelled flights, diverted
flights and wet- leased flights. The report shall be made in the form
manner set forth in accounting and reporting directives issued by the
Director, Office of Airline Statistics, and shall contain the
information: (1) Carrier and flight number. (2) Aircraft tail number.
Origin and Destination airport codes.
What this means is that the existence of an official passenger list
record of the flights schedule on the BTS database are inextricably
together. You cant have one without the other. (Well.. if you had a
scheduled flight with no-one booked , you would have the flight
no passenger list, but you cant have an official passenger list
BTS record of the sceduled flight. Therefore, any argument that the
were somehow left off the BTS schedule axiomatically means that there
also never any CRS (computerized reservation system ) booking set up
flight, so any passenger list has to be "under the counter" so to
therefore not qualifiable as official data. This scenario is
in any case, still raises a big "please explain."
The only way that one could have a passenger list which originated
CRS list but have no data of the schedule is if the BTS records were
systematically tampered with in violation of the regulations. This of
course, is not impossible, but if it happened for 11 and 77, then it
just as many questions as the more straightfoward interpretation that
flights were simply never scheduled.